What about evolution? Exclusive homosexuality goes against every type of evolutionary theory. If homosexuality is truly genetic then it wouldn’t last in the gene pool. It would die out in a few generations. It’s own survival would depend on the procreation of those that “deny” or “reject” their true genes. Can anyone give me another gene that is anywhere close to that type of self-destructive make-up? Some may give autism, or down syndrome as examples of self-destructive genes. Those types of genes are technically considered either mutations, diseases, chemical imbalances, or some type of deficiency.
Scientifically, what’s the definition of a living thing? There are many qualifications one must meet, such as ability to breathe, but one of the key requirements for a living thing is that it be able to reproduce. When was the last time homosexuality caused reproduction? Exclusive homosexuality denies one of the key elements of life. How can that be considered natural?
No comments:
Post a Comment